Re: several messages

From: Matthias Leisi <matthias at leisi.net>
To: michael.dillon at bt.com
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:55:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC09526433 at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC09526433 at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>


michael.dillon at bt.com schrieb:

> an informational RFC. A DNSBL sits in the middle of an
> end-to-end email transaction, and there is a danger of this

A fine, but important distinction: DNSxLs do not sit in the middle. They
provide data to the receiving mail system about the sending mail system,
which is then pretty much free to decide what to do with this data.

> If reputation systems are going to be an integral part
> of the future Internet email service, then this existing

"going to be"? They already are. Since about 10 or so years.

-- Matthias

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: several messages
  - From: michael.dillon

Prev by Date: Re: not spoofing, was IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
Previous by thread: RE: several messages
Next by thread: Re: several messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: several messages

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.