Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

From: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: 13 Nov 2008 11:23:02 -0000
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100000 at egate.xpasc.com>

>Given that the well known DNSBL causing me grief totally ignores my
>requests for removal, ...

I'd be interested in knowing what DNSBL it is.  Spamhaus PBL?
MAPS/Trend DUL?  SORBS?  Something else?

All the anonymous denunciations here are getting a bit tedious.

R's,
John
 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
  - From: Al Iverson
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
  - From: Jim Hill

References:
- Re: several messages
  - From: David Morris

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl(DNS Blacklists and Whitelists))
Next by Date: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Previous by thread: Re: several messages
Next by thread: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.