Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP

[SM <sm at resistor.net>]

At 08:19 10-11-2008, Russ Housley wrote:
> To make them all parallel in structure, the first numbered item in 
> section 3 becomes: "1. The IESG finds no conflict between this 
> document and IETF work."
>
> In RFC 3932, these numbered items (except the first one, which is 
> the same until the modification above) begin "The IESG 
> thinks"  During pre-Last-Call-review, I received feedback that "The 
> IESG finds" was a better.  Now, you propose "The IESG 
> believes".    I do believe that the current wording is better than 
> the original.  I'm willing to change it to something else if there 
> is consensus to do so.  What do other reviewers find/think/believe/prefer?

In a different message, John mentioned ""has concluded".  That sounds 
better as the numbered items are about conclusions reached.  My 
second preference would be "The IESG believes".

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf