Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Jim Hill <ietf at mx.rdns.org>]

David Romerstein in
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0811130905170.8743 at toro.popovich.net>:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jim Hill wrote:
> 
> > That seems to satisfy all the requirements for removal listed at
> > <http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml>
> 
> I believe that it's listed 'correctly', per that FAQ, for one reason:
> 
> [romer at toro mail]$ dig 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
> 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 86265 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.
> 
> CNAME, not PTR. SORBS *appears* to want PTRs (with appropriate TTLs).

There is a delegated ptr-record ... 

| dig ptr 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
| 
| ;; ANSWER SECTION:
| 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 59754 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.
| email.xpasc.com.        59754   IN      PTR     email.xpasc.com.

The ttl seems to be ok as well (ignore the above from my cache).
-- 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf