Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> If there were a BCP on the table that would permit us to talk
> about DNSRBLs that conform and those that don't, rather than
> about subjective opinions of "behaving badly", we would, IMO, be
> having a rather different discussion.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-04.txt
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
ROCKALL MALIN HEBRIDES: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7, INCREASING 7 OR GALE 8, PERHAPS
SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. RAIN, FOG PATCHES. MODERATE OR GOOD,
OCCASIONALLY VERY POOR.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
