Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Matthias Leisi <matthias at leisi.net>]

Andrew Sullivan schrieb:

> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg53776.html
> 
> For the impatient, one fundamental problem is that the current
> behaviour uses A records that do not contain host addresses, which is
> contrary to the definition of an A record.

And this counts as "fairly serious damage to the DNS protocol"? This
seems like a *tiny* bit exaggerated.

The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have
failed in this endeavour before.

-- Matthias
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf