Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
At 11:04 AM -0800 11/13/08, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have
>failed in this endeavour before.
>
>-- Matthias
What do you mean "failed in this endeavour"? failed to get an RR
assigned, or failed in deployment?
regards,
Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
