![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:33:46AM -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Huh? Concrete, real example: I send a message to an IETF mailing list. > A list subscriber's ISP rejects the forwarded message. IETF's mailman > drops the subscriber, because this has been happened multiple times. > I can't notify the subscriber, because their ISP also rejects my email. This is not a DNSBL problem. This is a problem with the subscriber's ISP, which is not operating their mail system per de facto best practices -- which include making sure that rejection notices provide an alternate-channel means of contacting them in order to discuss apparently-erroneous blocking. There are a sizable number of techniques for doing this; I happen to think the best ones are quite simple, e.g.: reject=550 5.7.1 <fred at example.com>... Mail refused - [201.45.252.2] listed by Spamhaus (http://www.spamhaus.org) - forward this message to nov-13-2008 at example.com if you believe this is a mistake of course nov-13-2008 at example.com needs to be exempted from the same blocking and should forward to the postmaster/abuse staff at example.com. There are From ietf-bounces at ietf.org Fri Nov 14 08:32:19 2008 Return-Path: <ietf-bounces at ietf.org> X-Original-To: ietf-archive at megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive at core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C15528C0F4; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:32:19 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D480528C206 for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:56:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLoGNqUEDMGN for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E9328C1CC for <ietf at ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:56:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.25.46.dsl.charm.net [207.114.25.46]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mADGu7RG012983 for <ietf at ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:56:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from avatar.gsp.org (avatar.gsp.org [192.168.0.11]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mADGogsY015343 for <ietf at ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:50:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from avatar.gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id mADGu1HP004049 for <ietf at ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:56:01 -0500 Received: (from rsk at localhost) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id mADGu1k7004048 for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:56:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:56:01 -0500 From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> To: ietf at ietf.org Subject: Re: several messages Message-ID: <20081113165601.GA2969 at gsp.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743 at toro.popovich.net> <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:32:18 -0800 X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:33:46AM -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Huh? Concrete, real example: I send a message to an IETF mailing list. > A list subscriber's ISP rejects the forwarded message. IETF's mailman > drops the subscriber, because this has been happened multiple times. > I can't notify the subscriber, because their ISP also rejects my email. This is not a DNSBL problem. This is a problem with the subscriber's ISP, which is not operating their mail system per de facto best practices -- which include making sure that rejection notices provide an alternate-channel means of contacting them in order to discuss apparently-erroneous blocking. There are a sizable number of techniques for doing this; I happen to think the best ones are quite simple, e.g.: reject=550 5.7.1 <fred at example.com>... Mail refused - [201.45.252.2] listed by Spamhaus (http://www.spamhaus.org) - forward this message to nov-13-2008 at example.com if you believe this is a mistake of course nov-13-2008 at example.com needs to be exempted from the same blocking and should forward to the postmaster/abuse staff at example.com. There are many othmany other ways to accomplish the same thing at minimal effort and cost; the unifying factor they all share is that recognize that all anti-spam setups have non-zero FP rates, so it's a good idea to be prepared to deal with those situations when they arise. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf er ways to accomplish the same thing at minimal effort and cost; the unifying factor they all share is that recognize that all anti-spam setups have non-zero FP rates, so it's a good idea to be prepared to deal with those situations when they arise. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.