RE: several messages

From: <michael.dillon at bt.com>
To: <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:12:11 -0000
In-reply-to: <CD64C7B22B676275CC9B8E98 at p3.int.jck.com>

  
> Although this one has been, IMO, a little more hostile than 
> necessary (on both sides), anyone who isn't interested in 
> that type of review should not be looking for IETF Standardization.

And for those who have not read the Tao of IETF, the
relevant section is 8.2. Letting Go Gracefully

   The biggest reason some people do not want their
   documents put on the IETF standards track is that
   they must give up change control of the protocol. 
   ...

<http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#anchor37>

--Michael Dillon

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: several messages
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: several messages
Next by Date: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Previous by thread: Re: several messages
Next by thread: Re: several messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: several messages

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.