Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>]

On Nov 14, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> If we are documenting practice and nothing more, then the  
> publication stream can move to informational and text can be added  
> on why a new RR, which would normally be expected here, is not being  
> used (essentially, inertia in the face of 15 years deployment).   
> That may be a valuable use of an RFC; documenting the way things  
> really work often is.  But it shouldn't go onto the standards track,  
> as there is a known technical deficiency.

Agreed.

-Doug
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf