Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?



yes, it's really a problem that IETF meeting organizers should seriously consider.



ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>From: "YAO" <healthyao at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: 
>To: <ietf at ietf.org>
>Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
>Date:Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:41 +0800
>
>
> 
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
> 
> which said "
> 
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
> 
>    Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>    be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>    all participants.
> "
> 
> My question is :"
> 
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as
IETF Meeting Venue ?"
> 
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf
is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.