![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
yes, it's really a problem that IETF meeting organizers should seriously consider. ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾Ìáµ½: >From: "YAO" <healthyao at gmail.com> >Reply-To: >To: <ietf at ietf.org> >Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? >Date:Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:41 +0800 > > > > according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3 > > which said " > > 2.3. Freedom of Participation > > Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could > be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for > all participants. > " > > My question is :" > > Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as IETF Meeting Venue ?" > > It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf is held in USA this time or other times > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.