Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74

From: Matthew Ford <ford at isoc.org>
To: David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>
Cc: Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE>, dcrocker at bbiw.net, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:49:13 +0000
In-reply-to: <1F527378-6BE8-4BC4-97AB-64B3D535E6C9 at virtualized.org>
References: <20081126175013.94E2828C161 at core3.amsl.com> <20081127164732.GH10931 at unknown.office.denic.de> <492EE10D.70303 at dcrocker.net> <1F527378-6BE8-4BC4-97AB-64B3D535E6C9 at virtualized.org>

On 27/11/08 19:36, David Conrad wrote:

 It's more that no one would notice.

After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quitestrongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able topoint to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significantmilestone.


Mat
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: Olaf Kolkman

References:
- Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: Peter Koch
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
  - From: David Conrad

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
Next by Date: Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
Next by thread: Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.