 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I remember it, the flood in the NOC was much more exciting then the DNSSEC bits. - Lucy
On Nov 27, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Matthew Ford wrote:
After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significant milestone.
Data point: IETF65 (Dallas) had a DNSSEC enabled recursive nameserver (and, if I recall well, signed reverse zones). No impact noticed whatsoever. I wonder how many people actually knew.
--Olaf
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.