![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 28/11/08 09:44, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 07:49:13PM +0000,Matthew Ford <ford at isoc.org> wrote a message of 13 lines which said:After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significant milestone.That would prove nothing: failures will DNSSEC do not happen every day. Signatures expire, people stop signing without telling the parent zone, keys rolls over, but it may not happen during these few days. You see the actual problems with DNSSEC (which are *not* FUD) when yourun it every day, for several months.
I said it would be a milestone. I didn't say it was the end of the road. Mat _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.