Re: The internet architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The internet architecture

From: Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org>
To: "<michael.dillon at bt.com>" <michael.dillon at bt.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org>, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:41:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC09B505E6 at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC09B505E6 at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>

On Dec 1, 2008, at 15:43 , <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:

Process control doesn't need IP at all at the
edge of their network.



This is a side-track, but:
Some people in the IETF, as well as in the industry, might disagree...
Watch out for the next billion nodes on the Internet.

Gruesse, Carsten (not speaking as 6lowpan co-chair today)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: The internet architecture
  - From: michael.dillon

Prev by Date: RE: The internet architecture
Next by Date: Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers
Previous by thread: RE: The internet architecture
Next by thread: Re: The internet architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.