Re: [BEHAVE] Handwaving? [Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BEHAVE] Handwaving? [Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )]



On 2 dec 2008, at 18:46, Ted Hardie wrote:

One way to fix that would be multipath transport protocols. Rather
than try to guess what works best, just use all of them (or at least
several) and get better performance without having to make difficult
choices.

It's not clear to me from the above whether you mean something
like "use SCTP",

Note that although SCTP is aware of multiple addresses, it won't actually use them concurrently. What I have in mind is a TCP that can use multiple paths at the same time. For the purposes of this discussion that would have to be a multiaddressing aware multipath TCP or a multipath TCP integrated with shim6/MIPv6.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.