Re: Friday experiment

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
Cc: John C Klensin <john at jck.com>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, stbryant at cisco.com
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:26:05 -0800
In-reply-to: <4931325B.7000705 at gmx.de>
References: <A6DDD13F88C9FAB3CFAB7A34 at p3.int.jck.com> <4931325B.7000705 at gmx.de>

At Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:15:23 +0100,
Julian Reschke wrote:
> I think it would be good to finally enforce the rules for agenda 
> submissions. For instance, if no agenda for a meeting is published in 
> time, the meeting shouldn't take place.

+1.

I find it incredibly frustrating to be a week out from IETF and 
not know what drafts I need to read.

-Ekr
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Friday experiment
  - From: Scott Brim

References:
- Re: Friday experiment
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Friday experiment
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
Next by Date: Re: Friday experiment
Previous by thread: Re: Friday experiment
Next by thread: Re: Friday experiment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Friday experiment

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.