Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary

From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner at fenron.com>
To: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf at jck.com>
Cc: iaoc at ietf.org, IETF Chair <chair at ietf.org>, ietf at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:39:56 -0800
In-reply-to: <D0193D7B32207ED805B2C838 at scan.jck.com>
References: <20081211224832.C04F33A69BD at core3.amsl.com> <D0193D7B32207ED805B2C838 at scan.jck.com>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:40 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com> wrote:
> ... the Trustees now believe that it is reasonable
> to [re] impose a deadline that gives the community two working
> days (it is already well into December 12 in much of the world)
> to modify and update tools to incorporate the new boilerplate.

They gave one working day of notice that they expected the tools to be
updated to begin accepting the new boilerplate last month, so this
notification is at least twice as reasonable.

  Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
  - From: IETF Chair
- Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
Next by Date: Re: Friday experiment
Previous by thread: Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
Next by thread: Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.