Re: 5378: A Worked Example

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 5378: A Worked Example

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:46:24 -0700
In-reply-to: <sdocz9zfdv.fsf at wes.hardakers.net>
References: <20081217154030.64E1150822 at romeo.rtfm.com> <sdocz9zfdv.fsf at wes.hardakers.net>

Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I'm not a layer so I don't understand the rules.
> I'm just somehow supposed to abide by the rules I don't understand.

Maybe we don't have a layering problem, we have a lawyering problem.

Repeat after me: I am not a layer!
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- 5378: A Worked Example
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: 5378: A Worked Example
  - From: Wes Hardaker

Prev by Date: Re: 5378: A Worked Example
Next by Date: Re: The internet architecture
Previous by thread: Re: 5378: A Worked Example
Next by thread: 5378: A worked example
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.