![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 17-Dec-08, at 11:06 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
Mark Seery allegedly wrote on 11/30/08 10:38 AM:Some questions have also risen WRT identity: http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2006-11-30-whoareyou.pdf Is identity a network level thing or an application level thing?Whatever. All of the above. There are many possible ways to use identifiers, particularly for "session" (whatever that is, at whatever layer) authentication and re-authentication. The point tolocator/identifier separation is primarily to get identification- related functions to stop depending on location-dependent tokens, i.e. locators.Once that's done, they can use anything they like -- and they do :-).
Agreed. They do.That does not mean that identity should not be an important part of the internet architecture.
Note also that the paper above mixes identity with identifiers. They are not the same thing
-- Dick _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.