Re: The internet architecture

From: Tony Finch <dot at dotat.at>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:02:59 +0000
In-reply-to: <20081229162852.79C526BE581 at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20081229162852.79C526BE581 at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>
> I have been thinking this for some time too, and it's especially
> true/clear when the multi-homing in question is site multi-homing, and
> not host-multihoming (which is much rarer, is my impression).

Most networkable consumer electronics ships with at least two network
interfaces. Host multihoming is only rare because it doesn't work.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
WIGHT PORTLAND: SOUTHEAST BACKING EAST 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5. SLIGHT,
OCCASIONALLY MODERATE IN PORTLAND. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY
POOR.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- RE: The internet architecture
  - From: Fleischman, Eric
- Re: The internet architecture
  - From: Marshall Eubanks

References:
- Re: The internet architecture
  - From: Noel Chiappa

Prev by Date: RE: The internet architecture
Next by Date: Re: The internet architecture
Previous by thread: RE: The internet architecture
Next by thread: Re: The internet architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: The internet architecture

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.