![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Dec 29, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Noel Chiappa wrote:I have been thinking this for some time too, and it's especiallytrue/clear when the multi-homing in question is site multi-homing, andnot host-multihoming (which is much rarer, is my impression).Most networkable consumer electronics ships with at least two network interfaces. Host multihoming is only rare because it doesn't work.
Why do you say it doesn't work ? I have found host multihoming to be very useful at times, especially if the local network uses several address blocks for whatever reason. (Note that of course
there is still a router routing this.)And, if you use a software based router (which many do) that is strictly speaking host multihoming.
Regards Marshall
Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ WIGHT PORTLAND: SOUTHEAST BACKING EAST 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5. SLIGHT,OCCASIONALLY MODERATE IN PORTLAND. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLYPOOR. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.