![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> --On Sunday, January 11, 2009 9:31 +1300 Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote: > > +1. > > > > Which is why I suggest that we should support the Trustees' > > proposed short term fix, to allow normal work to continue +/- > > cutting and pasting some boilerplate. We do have a glitch in > > 5378 to mend, but let's get that off the critical path. > To repeat myself, I will support that fix the moment the > Trustees' come forward and say, explicitly, "this is the problem > we are trying to solve, this is the principle we are using as > the basis of the solution, and, with the advice of Counsel, we > believe that this fix represents a competent, best-efforts, > legal-text representation of that principle and nothing else". +1 Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.