Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"



Um, I just looked at that thread, and it was talking more about
whether or not SDO's should be allowed to "fork" an RFC specification
without getting prior permission from the IETF or not, and worries
about "fake" RFC's.  That has nothing to do with shoving all of the
liabilities associating with assuring that all contributions following
the IPR responsibilities onto the I-D author/editors.

Maybe you thought it was implicit in the argument, but it certainly
wasn't obvious to me.  So if your goal was to advance that point of
view, it probably wasn't the best strategy as an advocate.

Regards,

						- Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.