![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Wha the work-around appears to me to provide is a way for
contributors to say, "But maybe I don't have them all." From my point
of view, that's less good than releasing the contributor from needing
to make such claims in the first place, but it's an improvement.
... > What's unusual in this case is that every contributor,
by virtue of having to assert that he or she has obtained the relevant permssions, is _also_ subject to those lawsuits.
+1.This nicely highlights the underlying problem with the approach has so far been taken: It expects far too much from people who are, in actual fact, acting as agents of the IETF.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.