 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 1:10 PM -0500 1/26/09, Sam Hartman wrote:I think having an opt-in list of people who have agreed to IETF IPR policy would be better.That list could be pre-populated with email addresses from all current IETF lists to which the "note well" has been sent.
That would seem to defeat the apparent purpose of this new list, namely distinct and explicit acknowledgment of the IPR policy. There is a difference between passing a Note Well past someone who is focussing on some other task, such as contributing to a technical discussion, versus having subscription be solely for the purpose of acknowledging the IPR policy. d/ ps. I'm not commenting on the efficacy of doing this separate list, merely trying to be clear about its differential semantics. -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.