RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem

["Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras at wilmerhale.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten at us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM
> To: Marshall Eubanks
> Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed 
> work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
> 
> > > NEW PROPOSED
> > >
> > >    c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations.  If a 
> Contributor
> > >       desires to limit the right to make modifications 
> and derivative
> 
> > s/desires/needs/
> 
> > I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed  
> > out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their  
> > judgement as to whether rights are available.
> 
> Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are
> talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the
> challenging case).  And "desires" is the wording that has been used
> here for a while. 
> 
> But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the
> motivations for needing to select this may vary.
> 
> How about "chooses"?
> 
> Thomas

"chooses" is fine with me