Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

I've gotten a bit lost on all the changes. Would it be possible to  
send to the list a single email that summarizes the current proposed  
changes to the document published on the web sight? or just a new copy  
of the document?

On Feb 9, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Contreras, Jorge wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten at us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM
> > To: Marshall Eubanks
> > Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; ietf at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed
> > work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
> >
> > > > NEW PROPOSED
> > > >
> > > >   c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations.  If a
> > Contributor
> > > >      desires to limit the right to make modifications
> > and derivative
> >
> > > s/desires/needs/
> >
> > > I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed
> > > out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their
> > > judgement as to whether rights are available.
> >
> > Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are
> > talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the
> > challenging case).  And "desires" is the wording that has been used
> > here for a while.
> >
> > But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the
> > motivations for needing to select this may vary.
> >
> > How about "chooses"?
> >
> > Thomas
>
> "chooses" is fine with me
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf