Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
To: Powers Chuck-RXCP20 <Chuck.Powers at motorola.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com>, <iesg at ietf.org>, <ietf at ietf.org>, <draft-housley-tls-authz-extns at tools.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:53:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <2963ECA56B01F94B9964469DCB8A2B5A055C7C6E at de01exm69.ds.mot.com>

On 2/11/09 9:47 AM, "Powers Chuck-RXCP20" <Chuck.Powers at motorola.com> wrote:
> I am curious - is this a commitment by the TLS chairs to actually work
> on this document? Or simply an attempt to prevent the IESG from
> advancing a document that the WG previously declined to work on, and
> could easily do so again?

I have no idea what Eric is thinking but I do think
that the environment has changed and that there's now
a lot more interest in authorization than there was
a few years ago.  That is to say, I think there are
more people who'd be able and/or inclined to work on
progressing the document.

Melinda

References:
- RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20

Prev by Date: please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
Next by Date: No patent-encumbered standards, please.
Previous by thread: RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Next by thread: Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.