![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
None of this suggests to me, however, that we ought to do something. My understanding (and I'd appreciate being disabused if I'm wrong) is that Mr Anderson is already not allowed to post to IETF lists, even though he sometimes manages to do so anyway. If I'm right, I can't see how banning him for longer, we mean it this time, neener neener, is any help. We just need better sieve rules, not better ietf ones.
Andrew Sullivan ajs at shinkuro.comOn 11-Feb-09, at 13:50, "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> wrote:
[...]
When I finally did manage to unsubscribe, the list owner re- subscribed me.I wonder whether he's doing this to all those FSF posters, too. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.