Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
To: Tim Polk <tim.polk at nist.gov>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:30:59 -0800
In-reply-to: <1A253EA8-BCF7-47D7-9A68-C9A7DE1423E8 at nist.gov>
References: <20090211053342.C765E50822 at romeo.rtfm.com> <1A253EA8-BCF7-47D7-9A68-C9A7DE1423E8 at nist.gov>

At 11:37 11-02-2009, Tim Polk wrote:

I will rectify the situation this week and request that the TLS WG
review
the document to gauge interest in this area.  I would be delighted to

Are you requesting that the TLS WG review an Internet-Draft thatexpired in December 2006?


Regards,

-sm

References:
- TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Tim Polk

Prev by Date: TLS authorization standard
Next by Date: Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Next by thread: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.