Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr at rtfm.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:46:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B286 at mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <d3aa5d00902102057y205fe3a3i9de7a3b10aacaecf at mail.gmail.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B286 at mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:05 -0800
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com> wrote:

> Could I just point out here the real risk that this relevant
> objection might get lost in the sea of irrelevant aggitation from the
> FSF supporters? 
> 
I agree.  Let's move the substantive discussion to the TLS WG mailing
list, or at least agree on some "secret" keyword to put into Subject:
lines that I can use for better filtering; I'm on the verge of
kill-filing anything with "authz" or "TLS" or "patent", at least if
they appear on the IETF list...


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

References:
- TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
Next by Date: Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
Previous by thread: RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Next by thread: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.