Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>
Cc: tls at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:07:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <07d901c98d3e$0fdb9f70$0201a8c0 at nsnintra.net>

On 2/12/09 1:16 PM, "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net> wrote:
> The main issue I have been struggeling with these authorization extensions
> inside TLS is that they happen at the wrong layer.

I don't know about that - I think it really depends on
how the TLS session is being used, etc.  I think that
the more ability traffic has to describe itself the better,
and that there are some non-trivial advantages to carrying
authorizations in-band.

Melinda

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Hannes Tschofenig

References:
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
  - From: Hannes Tschofenig

Prev by Date: RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Next by Date: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
Previous by thread: RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Next by thread: RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.