![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
> it's really important that the Subject contains the draft name.
> Otherwise, sorting becomes a nightmare.
> ...
> The radical alternative is of course a web-based method which ensures
> that comments are logged and stored per-document
I think these (and the per-draft mailboxes others have mentioned) are probably
all steps in a long-term plan, with the eventual optimum system being the
web-based thing you mention.
But please, let's not wait until we have something 'really good' working.
Let's move _right away_ to the simplest, fastest, easiest improvement on plain
old "ietf at ietf.org", i.e. "ietf-comments"; as soon as Subject: line tagging is
working (that works now with mailto:, right?), add that, then when separate
mailboxes are ready, add them, etc, etc.
Noel
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.