Re: LORAN is making a comeback..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LORAN is making a comeback..

From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu at gmail.com>
To: bitbucket at dev.null.ca
Cc: "Gary E. Miller" <gem at rellim.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:55:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0902121444410.30165 at mm.orthanc.ca>
References: <49948EC1.1020205 at earthlink.net> <a698c16a0902121416v2adc6578h9a66d9a6b67672e8 at mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0902121427460.12485 at catbert.rellim.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0902121444410.30165 at mm.orthanc.ca>

Lyndon Nerenberg a écrit :

Take it off line. This has nothing to do with the IETF.


I think this may be relevant to IETF.

I'm discovering LORAN, and there seems to be a foo channel over which IPcould run.

Maybe also LORAN-specific data could be encoded in UDP payloads. MaybeGeopriv WG could be relevant too.


Alex

References:
- LORAN is making a comeback..
  - From: TSG
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
  - From: Robinson Tryon
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
  - From: Gary E. Miller
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
  - From: Lyndon Nerenberg

Prev by Date: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
Next by Date: Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
Previous by thread: Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
Next by thread: Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.