RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Fri, 13 February 2009 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E256028C134 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YW9KQAl1vd5e for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DC128C19C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id AE26B6BE54C; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:27:37 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
Message-Id: <20090213172737.AE26B6BE54C@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:27:37 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:27:35 -0000
> From: "HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS" <jhuang1@att.com> > asking only "the IETF community" to respond to LC and even explicitly > state that "one should only respond (to LC) if he's subscribed to foo > and bar IETF mailing list" will probably not deter people from > 'drive-by' subscribing and posting of knee-jerk comments. Hence my suggestion of a separate mailing list. If the only list mentioned in the LC is "ietf-comments", I think people are not likely to find "ietf" on their own. Oh, and that suggestion that we change the wording to be "The IESG solicits final comments from the IETF community on whether the IETF community has consensus to publish" - that would be a good idea to do if we _don't_ set up a separate mailbox. If we _did_, we should leave it out, so that the public _does_ have someplace to send comments. Still, IMO 'one mailbox, no public comments' and 'one mailbox, accept public comments' are both inferior (for different reasons) to 'two mailboxes, accept public comments'. > But that's what will amount to if .. (3) no regulars would take the > risk to subscribe to the new mailing list. So no comment on the new > mailing list would effectively be heard. I was not recommended that the new mailbox be a bit-bucket - I explicitly called for it to be monitored by someone(s) who would bring anything novel and/or significant to all our attention. Noel
- Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Noel Chiappa
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Clint Chaplin
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Noel Chiappa
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate David Morris
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Willie Gillespie
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate David Morris
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Noel Chiappa
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Ralf Weber
- [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate] Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Michael Dillon
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Jari Arkko
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Noel Chiappa
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Noel Chiappa
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Ofer Inbar
- RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate David Morris
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… John C Klensin
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Tim Bray
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… John Levine
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… David Morris
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… John Levine
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerp… Noel Chiappa
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Cullen Jennings
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate David Morris
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate Brian E Carpenter