RE: References to Redphone's "patent"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: References to Redphone's "patent"

From: "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras at wilmerhale.com>
To: <lrosen at rosenlaw.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:54:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <265AEFC9577741F5A6B36FACDD757673 at LROSENTOSHIBA>

> 
> Shall we ask the FSF members of IETF also to comment on the 
> need for IETF to
> develop a comprehensive policy toward patents so that encumbrances to
> Internet standards can be understood and avoided in the future?
> 
> /Larry

IETF does have a patent policy.  It is at RFC 3979.  It may not be to
everyone's liking, but it does exist.

References:
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
  - From: Lawrence Rosen

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
Previous by thread: RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
Next by thread: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.