Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]

[David Morris <dwm at xpasc.com>]

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> Jari Arkko wrote:

> > Note that this opinion is entirely separate from the value of the comments. 
> > Repetition and mail bombing is not valuable. Well justified opinions are 
> > very valuable. The latter may come from both inside and outside the IETF; 
> > sometimes experts on some topic can be persuaded to send in a comment, but 
> > not to subscribe to lists or engage in lengthy debate. 
> I think anyone who posts to the IETF list should have his unsubscribe 
> function disabled for a week.
> That seems like a punishment that fits the crime.
>
> (despite the obvious workarounds)

But first, subscribing must be required, or automatic with the post 
confirmtion. I thought my 2 day penalty box was radical, but a week
would be fine with me.

Dave Morris