![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> From: "Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen at rosenlaw.com>
> This is an effective working model. I'm sure it would have to be
> revised to fit IETF's more democratic operations.
That's not the only change it would need:
W3C will not approve a Recommendation if it is aware that Essential Claims
exist which are not available on Royalty-Free terms.
That contradicts an IETF policy position which I would suggest is unlikely to
change (not that I personally have a strong preference for one alternative or
the other, mind).
Noel
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.