Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

From: ned+ietf at mauve.mrochek.com
To: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
Cc: tytso at mit.edu, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:23:47 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:20:54 +0000" <20090219102054.10340.qmail at simone.iecc.com>
References: <20090218022441.GA3600 at mini-me.lan> <20090219102054.10340.qmail at simone.iecc.com>

> >So you've done the equivalent of submit Windows source code and assume
> >that it can be ported to a Unix system "left as an exercise to the
> >reader"....  care to give a detailed suggestion about *how* it could
> >be revised to work with the IETF's more open procedures, and still be
> >useful in terms of meeting your stated goals?

> I wasn't kidding when I said submit a draft.

Neither was I.

> I realize that the chances of a significant change to the IETF's IPR
> policy are pretty slim, but if we find nobody finds it important
> enough to spend an hour throwing together a draft describing what he
> thinks we should do, we can stop now.

+1

				Ned

References:
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
  - From: Theodore Tso
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
  - From: John Levine

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Next by thread: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.