Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG

From: Scott Kitterman <scott at kitterman.com>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:32:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <499E0FAF.8050508 at dcrocker.net>
References: <20090220013123.A3F113A69A3 at core3.amsl.com> <499E0FAF.8050508 at dcrocker.net>

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:04:31 -0800 Dave CROCKER <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>This appeal lacks merit on basic points.
>
+1.  I don't think I could have said it better myself.  

I was involved in the MARID and DKIM working groups and was involved in the 
group that helped put together this draft.  All these points have been made 
before and got not traction in these various venues.

Scott K
Scott K

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

References:
- Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
  - From: The IESG
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
  - From: Dave CROCKER

Prev by Date: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Next by Date: RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Previous by thread: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Next by thread: RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.