Re: appeal-otis-2009-02-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: appeal-otis-2009-02-16

From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk at sendmail.com>
Cc: mail-vet-discuss at mipassoc.org, leiba at watson.ibm.com, tony at att.com, iesg at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:46:09 -0800
In-reply-to: <200902201857.n1KIvJUk086508 at protagonist.smi.sendmail.com>
References: <20090220013123.A3F113A69A3 at core3.amsl.com> <200902201857.n1KIvJUk086508 at protagonist.smi.sendmail.com>

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

As there are no new issues raised by this appeal, I respectfully request that
the appeal be dismissed.


+1

--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/

References:
- Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
  - From: The IESG
- [no subject]
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy

Prev by Date: Re: [IAB] IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [Trustees] LastCall for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem)
Next by Date: RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Previous by thread: [no subject]
Next by thread: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.