Re: [Trustees] [xml2rfc] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Trustees] [xml2rfc] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at nokia.com>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Cc: Trustees <trustees at ietf.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>, xml2rfc mailing list <xml2rfc at xml.resource.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>, "iab at iab.org IAB" <iab at iab.org>, The IESG <iesg at ietf.org>, John Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:15:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <ed6d469d0902231116y20996864id5e8cc8d01dc59ce at mail.gmail.com>
References: <9e8bc9820902052128i1fe6ba93ved493e7ac2ac5e5d at mail.gmail.com> <9e8bc9820902121653w30b162d7q4666503cf160c643 at mail.gmail.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0301B8C8D1 at xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <3AA0C01B-875A-40C3-8C7F-ABCF6F5FFDEF at isoc.org> <8F56CFA9EBFB5551B6CF567B at 10.200.10.92> <D5EA1CB5-0D10-47F6-959A-BA0C5D696D91 at isoc.org> <49A14558.1080002 at gmx.de> <1E3F3314-84CD-4AA4-8A84-37A1F101158D at isoc.org> <ed6d469d0902231116y20996864id5e8cc8d01dc59ce at mail.gmail.com>

Bill,

I believe this change from historic practice (moving ipr-related
statements from "Status of this Memo" to "Copyright Notice") will
require a new spin of the xml2rfc changes that I completed over the
weekend.  Is this really a good change to make right now?

No, I think we should move forward with the current tool. Thedeadline for publication for the San Francisco IETF is coming up soonand it's more important to get new Internet Drafts published thanmaking the boiler plate formatting perfect.


Many thanks to you and others for doing the xml2rfc tool updated.

Bob

References:
- Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ed Juskevicius
- RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Bill Fenner

Prev by Date: Re: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY
Next by Date: Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
Previous by thread: Re: [xml2rfc] [IAB] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Next by thread: Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Trustees] [xml2rfc] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.