Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

From: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier at isoc.org>
Cc: Trustees <trustees at ietf.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>, xml2rfc mailing list <xml2rfc at xml.resource.org>, "iab at iab.org IAB" <iab at iab.org>, The IESG <iesg at ietf.org>, John Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:16:04 -0800
In-reply-to: <1E3F3314-84CD-4AA4-8A84-37A1F101158D at isoc.org>
References: <9e8bc9820902052128i1fe6ba93ved493e7ac2ac5e5d at mail.gmail.com> <9e8bc9820902121653w30b162d7q4666503cf160c643 at mail.gmail.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0301B8C8D1 at xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <3AA0C01B-875A-40C3-8C7F-ABCF6F5FFDEF at isoc.org> <8F56CFA9EBFB5551B6CF567B at 10.200.10.92> <D5EA1CB5-0D10-47F6-959A-BA0C5D696D91 at isoc.org> <49A14558.1080002 at gmx.de> <1E3F3314-84CD-4AA4-8A84-37A1F101158D at isoc.org>

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier at isoc.org> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> - where should the escape clause appear in an I-D (in "Status of
>> this Memo", or in "Copyright Notice")?
> Copyright Notice

I believe this change from historic practice (moving ipr-related
statements from "Status of this Memo" to "Copyright Notice") will
require a new spin of the xml2rfc changes that I completed over the
weekend.  Is this really a good change to make right now?

  Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Trustees] [xml2rfc] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Bob Hinden
- Re: [IAB] [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ed Juskevicius
- RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
  - From: Ray Pelletier

Prev by Date: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Next by Date: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Previous by thread: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Next by thread: Re: [IAB] [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.