Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>]

On 2009-02-25 14:05, David Morris wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Morris wrote:
>>
>>> while providing the operational efficiency of collecting all
>>> discussion in one place for actual analysis of last call
>>
>> While there may be better ways of doing it, I'll note the IETF LC
>> subject line is constructed to make it possible to find the LC
>> comments. If you remove the draft name from subject line of any LC
>> replies, you substantially reduce the odds of them being found and
>> read by the IESG.
> 
> But by forcing that assumption, you preclude the possiblity of
> sub-dividing the discussion into related topics.


No. Just retain the draft name as part of the subject header.
To discuss foobars:

Subject: Foobars [Re: draft-ietf-barfoo-stuff-73.txt]

   Brian

    Brian