Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard

From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: Tony Hansen <tony at att.com>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <49A77A19.80505 at att.com>
References: <20090226181017.3328E3A6A6D at core3.amsl.com> <49A77A19.80505 at att.com>

Tony Hansen wrote:

Should it be using RFC5321/RFC5322 instead of RFC2821/RFC2822, such as
RFC5322.From instead of RFC2822.From?


yes.

current draft came out just before the latest RFCs were published.

final publication will be revised (and nits fixed -- thanks for the close read.)

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

References:
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Tony Hansen

Prev by Date: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org
Next by Date: Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.