 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livingood, Jason wrote:
Then the template has to be changed. Will the IETF still continue to accept documents formatted the old way or will it mandate this change everywhere - and gee - that could be our own little stimulus package - we may have to hire someone to move the (c) in all of the existing documents to the end pages with the licensing info.+1 - great idea. On 3/4/09 10:33 AM, "Margaret Wasserman" <mrw at lilacglade.org> wrote:
Todd
I would like to propose that we re-format Internet-Drafts such that the boilerplate (status and copyright) is moved to the back of the draft, and the abstract moves up to page 1. I don't believe that there are any legal implications to moving our IPR information to the back of the document, and it would be great not to have to page down at the beginning of every I-D to skip over it. If someone wants to check the licensing details, they could look at the end of the document. Margaret _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.