Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider

From: Nick Levinson <nick_levinson at yahoo.com>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Cc: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:38:50 -0700 (PDT)

I think you didn't mean domain. In that case, the catchall address encourages delivery. I'm looking for a guaranteed bounce, for test purposes, at any email service provider.

If you did mean domain, domains like example.com would give a different result than sending to a real domain.

The same address at any provider would be better.

-- 
Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider
  - From: Joel Jaeggli
- Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider
  - From: John R. Levine

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review - LISP does not involve separate namespaces for EIDs and RLOCs
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review - LISP does not involve separate namespaces for EIDs and RLOCs
Previous by thread: Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider
Next by thread: Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.