Re: IETF 78 Annoucement
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF 78 Annoucement



It took me three flights and about 35 or so hours of travel to get to
the Adelaide meeting, but that didn't keep me away. Grow up, people -
it's one trip out of your life! Go with the flow and enjoy it ....

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
<iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
> On 25 mei 2009, at 1:15, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>> SBA-LAX-AMS-Den Hague, the last hop in both cases being by train instead
>> of an airplane.
>
> ("'s-Gravenhage", "Den Haag", "The Hague", "La Haye", "La Haya" but not "Den
> Hague".)
>
> Yes, but that's a 30 minute train ride (to Amsterdam is 15 from the
> airport), running every 15 minutes (every hour after midnight) and close
> enough to take a taxi if you are so inclined. However:
>
> On 25 mei 2009, at 8:29, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
>
>> I'm not quite sure how a 1:50 or 2:30 hour train ride translates
>> to 4 hours of extra travel time.
>
> Easy: on the way back you need to build in extra time so if there is a
> problem with the train you don't miss your flight. Don't forget that unlike
> the major cities in the Netherlands Maastricht has a "single homed"
> connection to the Dutch rail network and I wouldn't want to take a 200 km
> taxi ride.
>
> So suppose you're flying from SFO with Northwest, leaving on friday. Land at
> 10:30 on saturday. (Results based on doing all of this the same week this
> year.) I don't think you'll make the 11:00 train, so it would have to be the
> 11:30 or 12:00 one, which gets you to the Maastricht train station at 14:04
> or 14:34 with 6 minutes to change trains in Utrecht. So far so good.
>
> However, on the way back your flight leaves at 11:10 which means you need to
> be at the airport at 9:00 or so. The first train in the morning leaves at
> 6:26 and is at Schiphol at 8:59 but that leaves almost no room for error.
> Dutch trains run on time 80% or so of the time and you need two, so 64%
> chance they're both on time...
>
> Maastricht is certainly not the worst IETF location ever, but sticking to
> one of the four main cities in the Netherlands would have been a whole lot
> better. Someone made the argument that the venues there are popular so you
> need to book long in advance. Don't we now have the dates set for the next
> five years??
>
> And as I said before, I would be very interested to learn whether doing this
> in june rather than july would have made a different location in the
> Netherlands a more viable option.
>
>> Anyway, during those hours, you
>> will be sitting on a chair as comfortable as in most planes.  I'd
>> think that most of us do what IETF'ers typically do: open their laptop
>> and start working.
>
> The non-double decker intercity trains are pretty nice and if you use first
> class then it's roomy and quiet. As long as you travel outside peak hours
> you should at least be able to sit in second class but lots of people
> talking and making phone calls.
>
> In case you get stuck at Schiphol or a train station (or if you can log into
> your mail within 2 minutes during stops):
>
> http://www.nshispeed.nl/en/services-ns-business-card-international/kpn-hotspots
>
> On 25 mei 2009, at 8:59, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
>> It is 3 changes from FRA, on one of the routes, but no changes from AMS or
>> BRU.
>
> Last time I checked planes don't land at the central station in Amsterdam or
> Brussels...
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.