Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-impl-reports (Guidance on Interoperation and Implementation Reports) to BCP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-impl-reports (Guidance on Interoperation and Implementation Reports) to BCP



Will do, assuming my co-author agrees.

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> At 2:45 PM -0700 5/26/09, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>>Good suggestions.  I do agree with explaining why a subset was tested
>>and how that subset was chosen.  In some cases, however, listing all
>>known implementations would be onerous, ambiguous (an implementation
>>that shipped (or went beta) with partial (or untested) possibly
>>unannounced standards support) or even contrary to privacy agreements.
>
> Fully agree. That's why I listed them as suggestions, and I hope that this document does so as well.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
>

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.